Disney Animated Films
Topic: UP is Disney/ Pixar’s first DUD

#	Author	Message
121	hopemax Sat 6/13/2009 9:00p	>Also, could someone clarify what the message of this film was supposed to be? < IMO, Live a great life.** * #1: You're never too old to go after a dream. * #2: Just because life didn't turn out the way you had planned when you were young, doesn't mean you haven't lived a great life.
122	ecdc Sat 6/13/2009 10:43p	>>Also, could someone clarify what the message of this film was supposed to be?<< If it's a good movie, it has no message beyond entertaining and leaving people to think a little about their own lives. I like movies that explore the human condition and experience. For me, I left Up feeling like if I could live a good life with the people I loved, that's a pretty decent adventure. When we die, 99.99% of us will be totally forgotten in two or three generations. Life is short and you just get the one. Make it a good one - it's in your hands.
123	Jim in Merced CA Sat 6/13/2009 10:50p	<If it's a good movie, it has no message beyond entertaining and leaving people to think a little about their own lives.> Really? I think good movies are written with a point to them. Otherwise -- why bother? <Life is short and you just get the one. Make it a good one - it's in your hands.> That was the same point Doc Brown passed along to Marty McFly at the end of the 'Back to the Future' series. Good advice!
124	crazycroc Sun 6/14/2009 7:15a	Okay, hopemax, thank you. That makes sense. Here's something else I took out of it. His wife wanted to go to some exotic place. HE PLANNED TO TAKE HER THERE AS A BALLOON SALESMAN AT AT ZOO, ON THAT SALARY!?! No wonder every time life happened they couldn't do anything. Weak. In my book, you work 2-3 jobs, get your wife there no matter what the cost. He should have "manned up" a long time before he did. I'm not fond of bad providers.
125	DAR Sun 6/14/2009 7:34a	<<(Is there a film that everybody on earth likes? Don't think so.)>> I have yet to run across someone who didn't at least enjoy Iron Man.
126	Jim in Merced CA Sun 6/14/2009 7:35a	<Weak. In my book, you work 2-3 jobs, get your wife there no matter what the cost. He should have "manned up" a long time before he did. I'm not fond of bad providers.> Okay, well now you're just cruel, crazycroc. :)
127	ecdc Sun 6/14/2009 8:56a	>>Really? I think good movies are written with a point to them. Otherwise -- why bother?<< I'm struggling with how to respond because, while I don't think movies should always be devoid of "messages," overall, I still disagree. Movies with really obvious messages usually fall flat. (Patch Adams, anyone?) And then, some movies are just great without any messages. What's the message in Alien, for example? The enduring human struggle to survive? Sorry, I just ain't buying it. That's just a heck of a movie and Ridley Scott manages to ratchet up the tension every step of the way. Great filmmaking and storytelling. I once asked a friend who's a filmmaker, who's been working on a biopic of a controversial historical figure for about 10 years, what he wants audiences to think about his subject. After all, I explained, he risks alienating people if he doesn't chart a careful course. I'll never forget his response: "I want them to be on the edge of their seats." Movies are there to entertain. Of course, some people are entertained by cars and helicopters that turn into talking robots. Me, not so much. I'm entertained by complex characters, the human condition, and compelling story lines. The two best films I've seen in the last five years are "There Will Be Blood" and "No Country for Old Men." Two movies that a lot of audiences left shaking their heads. "What was the point," many were asking. They were subtle enough to let people come up with their own message - if there eve was one. These movies had me entranced the whole time. If I take away a nice message afterwards, that's a bonus. But that's up to me; not the filmmaker.
128	ecdc Sun 6/14/2009 8:56a	I know I'm long-winded. I just really love talkin' movies :)
129	DAR Sun 6/14/2009 9:06a	<<The two best films I've seen in the last five years are "There Will Be Blood">> A little off topic but I thought that film just collapsed in the last 20 minutes. It just became too silly for me. I guess it's weird I can buy dogs flying a plane but I couldn't buy the ending of TWBB. But then Walt once taught me about the Plausible Impossible when it comes to animation. :)
130	DlandDug Mon 6/15/2009 11:14a	Certainly, anyone can dislike a film. And anyone can like (or even love) a film. I do have a few observations on some of the objections being raised-- not on the film as entertainment, but on certain plot devices and motivations. From post #89: >>...the movie jumped the shark when the house got caught in the storm and started being knocked around so violently.<< Why, exactly? It was a short but decisive sequence, most of which was left to our imagination. Most of the "violence" affected the objects inside the house, not the house itself. If anything, the real mystery is how it traveled such a great distance. But we don't know how long Carl's "nap" lasted, so that point is kind of moot. >>We've already established that Carl can break his arm...<< As a child... >>...and that he can't climb stairs...<< Actually, just that he doesn't climb stairs. >>...and yet this seventy-something year old guy spends the rest of the movie getting bopped and bashed, dragging a floating house, running from vicious dogs, and just generally having a strenuous time of it. And he never breaks a sweat, let alone an arm.<< He actuallly does get fatigued and cranky, mostly early in the film. I saw this character growing-- regaining his strength and will as the adventure unfolded. Carl was never established as weak or frail. Indeed, he mocks the notion early on when he playfully gets rid of Russell by sending him on the snipe hunt. This was a flash that foreshadowed Carl's later blossoming. >>Kevin can get hurt badly. Dug and Muntz can not get hurt at all.<< Both Dug and Muntz did get hurt, but not with anything as debilitationg as Kevin's leg injury. >>Russell can get hurt once if a gag calls for it but heals up instantly.<< It was a little welt that went away. I will say that Russell certainly could get (and stay) dirty. >>Muntz in his 90's? Try 110's. He had lunch with Teddy Roosevelt, remember? Spry old geezer, huh.<< I don't recall Muntz having lunch with Teddy Roosevelt. TR was President before World War I. Muntz's era is clearly the 1930s (era of air travel, filmed newsreels, Carl's childhood). Franklin D. Roosevelt was President then. I'm only sayin'... >>And he builds electronic psychic talking dog collars in a rain forest (why?)...<< We don't know when he built them or where. We do know he has always pampered those dogs, and has created other devices for their aid nd comfort. And collars that translate their thouights into words would ease the loneliness of his existence. (Oh, and aid immeasureably in the exposition of the film!) >>...and has a 70-year-old zeppelin with a spotless museum in it that is in airworthy condition, complete with hydrogen, staffed entirely by dogs.<< Yes. >>By the time we got to that ridiculous dogs flying airplanes thing (where did they get the planes and why?)...<< The planes are seen in storage inside the airship. Naturally, Muntz has outfitted them to be flown by dogs. Why? See above. >>If a character takes a ridiculous beating and doesn't get the least bit hurt...<< But the characters did get hurt, and did get fatigued. There's even a major gag that works only because of this. From post #103: >>...it wasn't until the house and its occupants floated safely through the hurricane and just happened to wind up within sight of the waterfall that I started having a leetle bit of trouble...<< What hurricane? Again, the scope of the storm was mostly left to the imagination. And I, too, was very skeptical that they just happened to end up in exactly the place they were seeking, until Russell pulled out his Wilderness Explorer GPS and explained he had learned how to steer the house. (This also leads one to believe that a pretty long stretch of time happened during Carl's "nap.") >>...I thought they didn't spend enough time with Muntz to establish him as a worthy villain. We went from "oh good there's Muntz" to "uh oh he's bad" in what? 4 minutes? That and the inexplicable invincibility of his opponents...<< Muntz was not as well drawn as I would have liked. But his motivation was always clear. He's just one in a long line of inexplicably obsessed villains whose attitudes change on a dime. From post #107: >>...if all the balloons were inside the house (waiting to be deployed), the house should've been flying as soon as they were all blown up.<< This was covered by the fact that we don't really see exactly what is going on behind the house just before lift off. The balloons are, indeed, tethered in a giant tarp. How Carl got them all up the chimney, tethered to the ground , and then released so easily is a bit of a stretch. (It's like asking how Santa, as magical as he may be, can climb up and down all those chimneys in one night!) From post #110: >>I can't bear the fact that Carl lost all his possessions... I know, I know, the point of the film was for him to stop living in the past and clinging to all those things and becoming a hermit.<< But there's even more to it than that. Carl doesn't "lose" all his possessions; he let's them go. He has to in order to rescue Russell. He figures out how to get that house back in the air-- by divesting himself of stuff. (And, in point of fact, it's all still there, right where Ellie always wanted it to be!) 119: >>Also, could someone clarify what the message of this film was supposed to be?<< To me it was very clear: Life is the adventure. When Carl sees how Ellie has finished her adventure book, he realizes the "Stuff I'm Going to Do" isn't what you wait around for. It's what is happening here and now. This is what galvanizes him to get rid of stuff in order to do stuff. The adventure doesn't end with the house sitting by the Falls. The adventure continues. Every day is filled with The Stuff I'm Going to Do.

All times are Pacific Time (US)

Note: Information on the discussion boards is sometimes based on rumors or incorrect information and should not be assumed true. Messages do not necessarily reflect the opinion of LaughingPlace.com or its editors.

More messages:	1-10	11-20	21-30	31-40	41-50
	51-60	61-70	71-80	81-90	91-100
	101-110	111-120	121-130	131-140	141-149

< Previous Topic

You must be a registered user to post messages.
Click here to register.
After registration you will automatically be brought back to this topic

Laughing Place Podcast
The LPP-oddcast celebrate Mickey's birthday, discuss the reopened Space Mountain and Christmas at Walt Disney World plus Reader Mail, Stump the Crew, the Captain's Challenge, 50 Words on 2012 and much more. Sponsored by HoJoAnaheim.com and MouseEarVacations.com.

What's on
The Latest
Miley Cyrus tour bus in fatal crash, Miley not aboard
Captain EO on the way back?
Mobile Magic Application Transforms Verizon Wireless Phones Into Electronic Tour Guides to Navigate Disney Parks
Disney Executives Swap Jobs
2009 Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade Sailor Mickey Mouse Plush Available Online
Disney Digital Books Expands Its Vast Library with Princess and the Frog Books
Disney Interactive Studios Starts a New Holiday Tradition with Disney's A Chrsitmas Carol Video Game
Jonas and Sonny With a Chance Video Games Invite Fans Onstage, Backstage and Beyond
Disney Cruise Line in Macy's Parade for the first time
Space Mountain preview

Click here for The Latest