Advertisement

The LaughingPlace Store

Featured in the LP Store


New!
Jeff Lange's Celebrate Disneyland 2009


New!
Jeff Lange's Disneyland Classics 5-DVD Set


2009-2010 Walt Disney World 16-Month Calendar


Magic in Pixels Photography - Magic Kingdom Entrance


Magic Journeys: Walt Disney World Volume 2 - Epcot (2-Disc DVD)


Jeff Lange Presents: Universe of Energy 25th Anniversary Collectors Edition (DVD)


Jeff Lange Remembers: Epcot's Spaceship Earth 25th Anniversary Collector's Edition (DVD)


Lanyard with Wallet - CARS (Red)

Disney Animated Films
Topic: Up is a box office bonanza!

#AuthorMessage
31
skinnerbox
Thu 6/18/2009 9:01a
<<The Usual Suspect has gone AWOL since post #9 back on June 6.>>

I'm assuming you're referring in part to me.

Hey, here's a piece of honesty for you...

UP is doing way better than I originally thought it would! I knew it would be successful (and even stated as much months ago in other threads) because of pre-opening "water cooler talk" in Emeryville. I'm just surprised it's doing as well as it is, given the economic downturn.

That being said... a little reality still needs to be thrown on all the Pixar cheerleading. (Yes, I've been a huge fan since the eighties because of friends who worked for Lucas, but the Pixar-can-do-no-wrong chanting does get tiresome.)

Box office receipts are all well and good. High returns are indeed the goal, especially internationally, since it's typically a bigger market than domestic. Rat's foreign box was outstanding (over $414 million) whereas WALL*E did 25% less (about $310 million). It will be interesting to see how well UP does internationally.

But if numbers is the game you wish to play, then look at the aftermarket, which is what really drives Disney's profit machine, especially toys. UP like WALL*E is sorely lacking in this department.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out why sequels are being made of Toy Story, Cars, and now Monsters. It's all about pre-sold franchises which do gangbuster business in the aftermarket. And these three film franchises are HUGE revenue generators regarding toys.

Personally, I'd rather have compelling films with unique stories that weren't required to easily lend themselves to cheap toys manufactured in China. But Disney is in the business to generate as much profit as possible, and the aftermarket is what mostly drives their decision making regarding production.

It will be interesting to see what happens to Pixar film quality in future films that were developed AFTER the acquisition back in 2006. Technically, TS3 would fall into this category, but it's not an original starting-from-scratch character development. None of the current films in production can be classified this way. Either they were conceived of before the acquisition (UP, newt, and Bow/Bear), or they're part of an existing franchise (TS3, Cars 2, and Monsters 2).

So it looks like we'll have to wait until John Carter before having a sense of what Pixar's production process will be with original characters, post-acquisition. People keep claiming that Disney is "hands off" with regard to Pixar, but I don't believe it for a second.
32
DlandDug
Thu 6/18/2009 1:47p
>>Hey, here's a piece of honesty for you...<<
I certainly do appreciate the candor. I am nonplussed at the argument that follows (about after market), however. It is not so much moving the goalposts as moving the whole game to different playing field.

>>UP is doing way better than I originally thought it would! I knew it would be successful...<<
Ah, there's the discuaaion I thought we were having. But I seem to recall that the basic thesis (stated both last year about WALL-E and this year about UP) was two-fold: Pixar's films were in a revenue decline (which would lead Disney to take away their autonomy), and that future films could never aspire to the revenues of Finding Nemo (never mind that it seems a bit unfair to choose a box office phenom as a benchmark).

WALL-E definitively disproved the first thesis, and UP now threatens the second. So we now are informed that it is really the after market that is driving the dynamic between Pixar and Disney.

>>... a little reality still needs to be thrown on all the Pixar cheerleading. (Yes, I've been a huge fan since the eighties because of friends who worked for Lucas, but the Pixar-can-do-no-wrong chanting does get tiresome.)<<
No cheerleader here, although I am one of the many, many unabashed fans sitting in the stadium. What can I say-- I respond favorably to well made films. (P.S. The Pixar-is-heading-for-a-mighty-big-fall chanting also gets tiresome.)

>>Box office receipts are all well and good.<<
Apparently not anymore (as we will see when we read on)...

>>High returns are indeed the goal, especially internationally, since it's typically a bigger market than domestic. Rat's foreign box was outstanding (over $414 million) whereas WALL*E did 25% less (about $310 million). It will be interesting to see how well UP does internationally.<<
Yes, yes it will.

>>But if numbers is the game you wish to play...<<
That's not the game, it's the name of the thread. Box office. We discuss box office numbers here.

>>But if numbers is the game you wish to play then look at the aftermarket, which is what really drives Disney's profit machine, especially toys.<<
Which would be well and good to discuss in a thread about after market. Or total profit. Or anything other than box office.

>>It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out why sequels are being made of Toy Story, Cars, and now Monsters.<<
Uh oh. Hope this doesn't go where I think it's going...

>>It's all about pre-sold franchises which do gangbuster business in the aftermarket...<<
Oh dear, it has gone off on a tangent. OK, I'll bite. Toy Story, you bet. Cars, ABSOLUTELY. (wish I had bigger caps for that one!) Monsters, Inc...? Really? Every kid in America has a plush Sully and a Monstropolis Play Set? I guess I missed that one.

>>Personally, I'd rather have compelling films with unique stories that weren't required to easily lend themselves to cheap toys manufactured in China.<<
But these are not mutually exclusive.

>>But Disney is in the business to generate as much profit as possible, and the aftermarket is what mostly drives their decision making regarding production.<<
I have no idea whether this is true or not. If so, then it is a good thing they aren't making the decisions for Pixar. You know, Pixar, who makes those compelling films with unique stories about rats who want to be gourmet cooks, and lonely robots who fall in love, and old men who tie balloons to their house and fly away?

>>It will be interesting to see what happens to Pixar film quality in future films that were developed AFTER the acquisition back in 2006... People keep claiming that Disney is "hands off" with regard to Pixar, but I don't believe it for a second.<<
All well and good, but just how far afield does this go from a discussion of UP's box office? Pretty far. Interesting.
33
skinnerbox
Thu 6/18/2009 2:02p
<<If so, then it is a good thing they aren't making the decisions for Pixar.>>

You don't know that. Nobody but the top executives knows that. Just because this PR claim has been made doesn't mean it's true.

Most fanboys believe that Lasseter has decision making power regarding WDI and the parks, just because he has the fancy pants title of "Principle Creative Advisor." Truth is, he doesn't. Just ask leemac.

<<You know, Pixar, who makes those compelling films with unique stories about rats who want to be gourmet cooks, and lonely robots who fall in love, and old men who tie balloons to their house and fly away?>>

All of which were into production before Pixar's acquisition by Disney. These films were conceived by an independent Pixar, post Disney contract. Cars was the last film done in conjunction with Disney; Rat, WALL*E, and UP were originally developed outside of that agreement to be distributed by some other company.

Get back to me when Pixar releases their next film with new and original characters that were developed AFTER the acquisition, hopefully in 2014.

34
DlandDug
Thu 6/18/2009 2:20p
>><<If so, then it is a good thing they aren't making the decisions for Pixar.>>

You don't know that.<<
I am genuinely sorry that my sarcasm on that one wasn't more evident. I just hate to use emoticons-- and there aren't any that truly represent sarcasm.

>>Get back to me when Pixar releases their next film with new and original characters that were developed AFTER the acquisition, hopefully in 2014.<<
Will do. And if you want to discuss after market (which is a fascinating topic, and I mean that sincerely) I've started a separate thread.
35
DlandDug
Thu 6/18/2009 2:20p
(P.S. And about UP. It is a box office bonanza, no?)
36
DlandDug
Thu 6/18/2009 2:21p
>>Most fanboys believe that Lasseter has decision making power regarding WDI and the parks, just because he has the fancy pants title of "Principle Creative Advisor." Truth is, he doesn't. Just ask leemac.<<

Just wondering... what is leemac's fancy pants title?
37
alexbook
Thu 6/18/2009 2:23p
I always enjoy meaningless lists. Did you know that "Up" now has Disney's 18th highest domestic box office receipts?

The Top 20: PotC: Dead Man's Chest. Finding Nemo. The Lion King. PotC: At World's End. PotC: The Curse of the Black Pearl. Sixth Sense. The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe. The Incredibles. Monsters, Inc. Toy Story 2. Cars. Signs. WALL-E. National Treasure: Book of Secrets. Aladdin. Ratatouille. Armageddon. Up. Pearl Harbor. Toy Story.
38
leemac
Thu 6/18/2009 3:27p
<<Just wondering... what is leemac's fancy pants title?>>

Senior Executive Senior Vice-President, Senior Chief Creative Executive, Creative Development, NIP (Nothing In Particular).

I kid you not - I currently have four different business cards with four different titles (each at least 8 words in length) that I have to use in particular circumstances.

I'd happily be called Gopher to be honest. The Company gets way too hung up on job titles. They are meaningless without power - ask John L about that.

:-)
39
ADMIN
Thu 6/18/2009 3:31p
Message removed by an administrator. Click here for the LaughingPlace.com Community Standards.
40
DlandDug
Thu 6/18/2009 3:52p
As PREDICTED here previously, UP has now passed the box office total of Monsters vs. Aliens. UP, in its fourth week, is poised to pass the $200 million mark before this weekend's figures are in.
All times are Pacific Time (US)

Note: Information on the discussion boards is sometimes based on rumors or incorrect information and should not be assumed true. Messages do not necessarily reflect the opinion of LaughingPlace.com or its editors.

More messages: 1-1011-2021-3031-4041-50
 51-6061-7071-8081-9091-100
 101-110111-120121-130131-140141-143

              < Previous Topic

Next Topic >              


You must be a registered user to post messages.
Click here to register.

After registration you will automatically be brought back to this topic


LP Live Recent Picture

Margaret Kerry and Diane Disney Miller at the Walt Disney Family Museum
Posted: 11/21/09
Laughing Place Podcast
The LPP-oddcast celebrate Mickey's birthday, discuss the reopened Space Mountain and Christmas at Walt Disney World plus Reader Mail, Stump the Crew, the Captain's Challenge, 50 Words on 2012 and much more. Sponsored by HoJoAnaheim.com and MouseEarVacations.com.

What's on
The Latest
Miley Cyrus tour bus in fatal crash, Miley not aboard
Captain EO on the way back?
Mobile Magic Application Transforms Verizon Wireless Phones Into Electronic Tour Guides to Navigate Disney Parks
Disney Executives Swap Jobs
2009 Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade Sailor Mickey Mouse Plush Available Online
Disney Digital Books Expands Its Vast Library with Princess and the Frog Books
Disney Interactive Studios Starts a New Holiday Tradition with Disney's A Chrsitmas Carol Video Game
Jonas and Sonny With a Chance Video Games Invite Fans Onstage, Backstage and Beyond
Disney Cruise Line in Macy's Parade for the first time
Space Mountain preview

Click here for The Latest