| # | Author | Message |
311
| brotherdave
Sun 6/9/2002 7:54p | Lumiere to Beast in the Broadway show. |
312
| ToonKirby
Mon 6/10/2002 8:51p | Very good ... you're up. |
313
| brotherdave
Mon 6/10/2002 8:53p | I guess I should have left the dress in the bottom of the trunk. |
314
| JThad
Mon 6/10/2002 10:07p | The wardrobe? Beauty and the Beast. |
315
| GGGF
Tue 6/11/2002 8:55a | I dunno, but I guess you should go JThad, it's been 24 hours... |
316
| Wendybird
Tue 6/11/2002 9:38a | Give brotherdave a chance to respond! It's his turn to verify any wrong or right answers, it's not fair to just skip over him. |
317
| GGGF
Tue 6/11/2002 9:49a | It's been the general consensus that it there is inactivity on any end after a 24 hour period, than in the interest of keeping the topic alive we should move on.
|
318
| Wendybird
Tue 6/11/2002 10:01a | No, GGGF, remember, it's 24 hours after the question has been answered that the asker has time to verify. And it has not yet been 24 hours since JThad answered it. |
319
| GGGF
Tue 6/11/2002 10:21a | I thought you said you didn't like the 24 hour rule?
Anyway, a whole day and a half has passed by, so don't tell me it's has not being 24 hours.
Am I angry? A little. First, I got hammered because I didn't follow the rule, and now I'm being criticized for follwing it. |
320
| Wendybird
Tue 6/11/2002 11:23a | No, I don't like the 24 hour rule, but if that's the way people are playing, I need to go by it, right? I was just referring back to old posts to see what the general consensus was on how to carry out the rules.
JThad answered "the wardrobe" at 10:07 p.m. on 6/10, that was just over 13 hours ago.
My deepest apologies, GGGF, I really didn't mean to offend you. I've been following this thread for a long time, and I've never seen anyone else be so strict about the 24 hour thing, so it kind of frustrated me. But like I said, if those are the rules, I will be happy to go along with them, just like everyone else. |
