| # | Author | Message |
211
| ModHatter
Sat 11/6/2004 6:07p | Ah, the continued bashing of people because you perceive them as bashing... MUCH better topic for this thread :rolleyes: |
212
| thenurmis
Sat 11/6/2004 6:59p | Not really bashing, as much as having fun disliking something.
In some ways we are really the same. Where some injoy looking at the light side of things, other injoy the dark side. The trick, (if you could call it that) is what is dark and what is light.
All a mater of perspective I guess.
But in some ways your point is well taken, I didn't mean my coment to sway the course of the topic.
"Why is DCA a failure"
because that is the way you choose to see it. |
213
| onlyme
Sat 11/6/2004 8:38p | Again, I say: Who gives a hoot whether 'you'(implying no one, in particular)likes DCA, or not. If 'you' enjoy it; feel comfortable with that, like me, and move on. |
214
| onlyme
Sat 11/6/2004 8:50p | If it's at all possible to sift through my lousy grammer, you'll find the point I was TRYING to make was: If you enjoy DCA-great. Why bother convincing others their wrong for not. |
215
| thenurmis
Sat 11/6/2004 8:56p | Why bother convincing others their wrong for not.
AHHHH
best point so far
well put |
216
| onlyme
Sat 11/6/2004 9:06p | >>Why bother convincing others their wrong for not<<
Sorry, I've been up since 4 a.m. Why do I do this.......'their' should be 'they're'
With all of these corrections, I guess my point goes right out the window. That's it for me tonight!! |
217
| thenurmis
Sat 11/6/2004 9:17p | nope, it made sence enough.
Good night |
218
| trekkeruss
Sun 11/7/2004 12:25a | OK, I've spent a good amount of time reading this entire thread. I've come to the conclusion that the final answer is:
DCA is a failure to those of you that see it as such, and you will continue to analyze it under a microscope, because that is what Disney fans like to do.
On the other hand, DCA is not a failure to those of you that like it, but it is generally admitted that DCA by you that could be better.
I think I will go to bed now. :-P |
219
| oc_dean
Sun 11/7/2004 2:29a | >>Not really bashing, as much as having fun disliking something.<<
Picture a Coca-Cola Company discussion board .. and people dissing "The New Coke" that came out several years ago. Never to be seen again. Obviously, not enough people liked it .. and they pulled it.
|
220
| thenurmis
Sun 11/7/2004 9:30a | Picture a Coca-Cola Company discussion board .. and people dissing "The New Coke" that came out several years ago. Never to be seen again. Obviously, not enough people liked it .. and they pulled it.
Very true, yet Coke still tries with new product such as C2.
I really don't have any problem with people not liking DCA. It a freedom of choice thing and good. I do at times get a bit flustered at the method, and attidude of the attack, as i am suspect to the reasom, (at times).
Still I'm sure that there are those who do not injoy the return volley in these topic's. But you have to know that if you create a higly polerized topic or thread, you are going to get heated discussion.
It is all good, and for the most part injoyable as long as we don't get too personal, or too serious with our posts.
I for one like this (and thse types of ) threads. It is always good to see things through other peoples eyes.
There have been many good point made for and against the park. Yet none have really changed my point of view, of DCA.
<DCA is a failure to those of you that see it as such, and you will continue to analyze it under a microscope, because that is what Disney fans like to do.
On the other hand, DCA is not a failure to those of you that like it, but it is generally admitted that DCA by you that could be better.>
point and game.
|
